A Sikh theocratic state would be corrupted by the vegetarian Taksalis with their Vishnu Nirmala influenced roots. Meat eaters, people listening to music outside Gurbani and people without kesh would be heavily taxed, or worse killed.
Who would lead this raj? Another Jarnail Singh with his council of Singhs, such as womanizers like Sodhi and Labh Singh?
Remember most people who converted to Sikhi during Ranjit Singh's time were opportunistic converts. The same thing would happen if Khalsa Raj was achieved today.
The taxation and lack of rights would force non-Sikhs to convert to Sikhi. These converts would not be true Sikhs. They would eventually taint and dilute the Panth, although the Nirmalas have already done that.
Thus, the alternative would be to for Khalsa Raj to kill all non-Sikhs. If that's the case then is Khalsa Raj really better than Hindoo, Christian or Islamic rule?
Besides, Sikhs would just start killing each other. Look no further than Binod Singh betraying Banda Singh or the Misls fighting one another.
This is 2025 and not 80’s taksalis are all gone, the remaining are badal puppets. Yes vegetarianism’s vehm palekhe are to be blamed on Akhand kirtanis and taksalis but it’s no more 80’s. Iran is a theocratic state, they never did tax other shia sects or minorities. Even the code of conduct isn’t strictly enforced on the people other than women which is understandable. New leadership and new vision is possible as taksalis are gone.
You hear harnek nekki New Zealand on taksalis clearly considering your views on bhai sodhi and general labh singh as womanisers. Sodhi part is clearly made up and labh singh wala is well accepted but he didn’t sit on his sofa and yap did he? He gave his life for a cause. Awde tabbar di peedi ch daso kine ditti shaheedi. Individual bases te judge na karo ji, every man has his guilty phase, no one’s perfect.
I wouldn’t support dharam yudh morcha either I hold the same opinion on it as kukki gill. Thinking with hot heads has cost us pretty much everything today.
All those killings, bibiya dishonoured gone to vain without achieving anything.
You’re too ignorant Singh. Read pettigrew on Sikh jujharus and their attitude towards non-Sikhs, she wasn’t taksali funded don’t worry.
The Taksal maybe wrong when it comes to maryada and selective with scriptures but their dedication towards Sikh cause is something every yapper sitting on sofa should learn from. Sure they did fall for Indian regime’s bait but their intentions were always genuine. The armed struggle was not a suicide either, it could have been possible to win and by 89’ northern Punjab and western cities of Malwa were completely under control and influence, if another nation would have intervened things could have turned out on Sikh’s favour. Sadly lack of cooperation, Pakistan backing out in a crucial phase ,and excessive govt infiltration caused great loss.
Who actually are you trying to convince Singh? Most of these clowns seem to be originating from the rSikh Corner/rSikhiism/rSikh subreddits. They are dumping grounds pretty much for character assassination and cringing about Sikhi and Sikhs under the guise of "this and that is Brahminism."
Do they have any practical solutions to any Sikh dilemma? Besides a cringefest of blaming others, nothing much. Do they have any evidence to back up their claims? Besides claiming you are egoistical and are doing u-turns, nothing.
They are disillusioned and that's it. Let them remain mired in their cynicism. It's all that is left for them now.
A Sikh theocratic state would be corrupted by the vegetarian Taksalis with their Vishnu Nirmala influenced roots. Meat eaters, people listening to music outside Gurbani and people without kesh would be heavily taxed, or worse killed.
Who would lead this raj? Another Jarnail Singh with his council of Singhs, such as womanizers like Sodhi and Labh Singh?
Remember most people who converted to Sikhi during Ranjit Singh's time were opportunistic converts. The same thing would happen if Khalsa Raj was achieved today.
The taxation and lack of rights would force non-Sikhs to convert to Sikhi. These converts would not be true Sikhs. They would eventually taint and dilute the Panth, although the Nirmalas have already done that.
Thus, the alternative would be to for Khalsa Raj to kill all non-Sikhs. If that's the case then is Khalsa Raj really better than Hindoo, Christian or Islamic rule?
Besides, Sikhs would just start killing each other. Look no further than Binod Singh betraying Banda Singh or the Misls fighting one another.
This is 2025 and not 80’s taksalis are all gone, the remaining are badal puppets. Yes vegetarianism’s vehm palekhe are to be blamed on Akhand kirtanis and taksalis but it’s no more 80’s. Iran is a theocratic state, they never did tax other shia sects or minorities. Even the code of conduct isn’t strictly enforced on the people other than women which is understandable. New leadership and new vision is possible as taksalis are gone.
You hear harnek nekki New Zealand on taksalis clearly considering your views on bhai sodhi and general labh singh as womanisers. Sodhi part is clearly made up and labh singh wala is well accepted but he didn’t sit on his sofa and yap did he? He gave his life for a cause. Awde tabbar di peedi ch daso kine ditti shaheedi. Individual bases te judge na karo ji, every man has his guilty phase, no one’s perfect.
I wouldn’t support dharam yudh morcha either I hold the same opinion on it as kukki gill. Thinking with hot heads has cost us pretty much everything today.
All those killings, bibiya dishonoured gone to vain without achieving anything.
You’re too ignorant Singh. Read pettigrew on Sikh jujharus and their attitude towards non-Sikhs, she wasn’t taksali funded don’t worry.
The Taksal maybe wrong when it comes to maryada and selective with scriptures but their dedication towards Sikh cause is something every yapper sitting on sofa should learn from. Sure they did fall for Indian regime’s bait but their intentions were always genuine. The armed struggle was not a suicide either, it could have been possible to win and by 89’ northern Punjab and western cities of Malwa were completely under control and influence, if another nation would have intervened things could have turned out on Sikh’s favour. Sadly lack of cooperation, Pakistan backing out in a crucial phase ,and excessive govt infiltration caused great loss.
Who actually are you trying to convince Singh? Most of these clowns seem to be originating from the rSikh Corner/rSikhiism/rSikh subreddits. They are dumping grounds pretty much for character assassination and cringing about Sikhi and Sikhs under the guise of "this and that is Brahminism."
Do they have any practical solutions to any Sikh dilemma? Besides a cringefest of blaming others, nothing much. Do they have any evidence to back up their claims? Besides claiming you are egoistical and are doing u-turns, nothing.
They are disillusioned and that's it. Let them remain mired in their cynicism. It's all that is left for them now.