Dr. Dhillon has valid perspectives. We believe that this Namdev incident is an ethical lesson intended for progressive leaderships.
On the issue of Zafarnamah, we believe it is authentic to a degree (given the original is yet to be located). But it still does not establish the veracity of the so-called Dasam Granth.
The initial correspondence was the 'Fatehnamah.' It was more blunt and quite candid in its denouncement of Aurangzeb and even Islam etc. The key to unlocking one part of this puzzle is to try discovering Aurangzeb's reply.
Dr. Dhillon has valid perspectives. We believe that this Namdev incident is an ethical lesson intended for progressive leaderships.
On the issue of Zafarnamah, we believe it is authentic to a degree (given the original is yet to be located). But it still does not establish the veracity of the so-called Dasam Granth.
The initial correspondence was the 'Fatehnamah.' It was more blunt and quite candid in its denouncement of Aurangzeb and even Islam etc. The key to unlocking one part of this puzzle is to try discovering Aurangzeb's reply.